CODISCOVR (eDiscovery)

The proliferation of electronically stored information (ESI) has made it infinitely more difficult for businesses to manage, index, access, and preserve their own data. Employees routinely work on personal devices and essential business data is no longer centrally controlled. While the portability of data enhances operating flexibility and communication, it can also lead to enormous problems when a business becomes involved in litigation. Case outcomes increasingly turn on electronic evidence, and courts have recently issued large penalties against companies that were not able to properly respond to requests for electronically stored data. Given the importance of e-discovery in today’s digital marketplace, companies must have experienced and sophisticated e-discovery counsel.

The firm represents a wide variety of public and private companies on the full range of e-discovery issues. Cozen O’Connor attorneys provide comprehensive litigation readiness counseling, which means that we help clients get their electronic houses in order before being confronted with an actual claim. We map the location of critical data; establish policies for collection, retention, destruction, and extraction of data; perform e-discovery fire drills; and train employees in best practices. We also advise clients on the preservation, collection, review, protection, and production of electronic data in the context of active litigation or government investigations. We not only help clients respond efficiently to e-discovery requests, we also craft e-discovery strategies that affirmatively place clients in the best possible position.

Cozen O’Connor is one of the few large firms in the country that combines cutting-edge technological savvy with an immense amount of hands-on trial experience. Being able to accurately anticipate how evidence will be used and perceived at trial is essential when making critical early decisions about e-discovery strategy. Whether interviewing custodians of relevant data, drafting litigation holds, presenting the court with a preservation and protection plan, or advocating for a particular set of e-discovery parameters, Cozen O’Connor’s lawyers bring their well-known trials skills to bear.

OUR ATTORNEYS

Our attorneys stand at the lead of the emerging e-discovery field. Members of our team have served on the electronic discovery advisory panel for ARMA (the international trade association representing records and information managers); served on the board of the Defense Research Institute’s E-Discovery Committee; been active participants in The Sedona Conference, a research and educational institute dedicated to the advanced study of law and policy; and are Certified Information Privacy Professionals (CIPP/US) through the International Association of Privacy Professionals. Cozen O’Connor attorneys frequently speak at national conferences on e-discovery and digital forensics, and have published numerous articles concerning electronic discovery and practice and advisory services.

SERVICE AREAS

  • Advise on all aspects of e-discovery in the context of active litigation and government investigations, including methods for preservation, collection, review, protection, and production of electronic data

  • Negotiate with adversaries over the scope and format of electronic productions

  • Draft and manage “litigation holds” to avoid allegations of spoliation and potential sanctions

  • Investigate alleged improper access of electronically stored information (ESI)

  • Supervise review of electronic records by e-discovery vendors and contract attorneys

  • Work closely with computer forensics experts in electronic information investigations

  • Develop best practices governing the retention, storage, collection, destruction, and extraction of ES

  • Advise on software to improve tracking, retention, organization, and archiving of data

  • Lead interdisciplinary teams of IT and records management specialists, vendors, consultants, and in-house counsel to ensure the use of proper document-retention policies

  • Train clients on e-mail use, document retention, and other records retention issues

  • Develop pilot programs to audit internal e-discovery processes and identify problem areas

  • Conduct review of and apply data analytics to electronic records

TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONALS

Our technology professionals have decades of experience collecting and managing electronic evidence for service providers, government agencies and law firms.  They are active members of the International Legal Technology Association (ILTA ) community and hold Certified Administrator and Certified User certifications issued by the leading document review platform in the legal space, Relativity. 

SERVICE AREAS

Our team manages data in-house utilizing the industry’s leading technologies to provide efficient and expert information management services, including:

  • Mapping the location of critical data, including identifying custodians

  • Preserving potentially relevant data sources

  • Coordinating the collection of data sources and custodians with clients

  • Collecting, processing and hosting data

  • Employing data analytics early-on to assess the magnitude and composition of a data set

  • Identifying the scope of data that needs to be reviewed

  • Leveraging technology to assist with review (e.g. Conceptual Searching and Active Learning)

  • Conducting early discrepancy searches to identify issues that need swift resolution

  • Imaging, Bates-numbering, and encrypting documents in preparation for production

  • Discussing threading, analytics, and production options to meet the needs and budget of the client

 

Share on LinkedIn

Publications

Clawback Orders Can Prevent Fighting Tooth and Claw Over Discovery - Case Law Update [eDiscovery Alert]

February 07, 2024

Nicole Gill discussed a recent case involving an administrative summons issued by the IRS, a federal court denied the respondent’s request for a clawback order under Rule 502(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Yours, Mine, or Ours? Can Employees Claim Privilege over Employer-Issued Email Accounts? - Case Law Update [eDiscovery Alert]

January 24, 2024

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill discussed how an employee found out the hard way that utilizing her work email account to communicate with her personal attorney was a risky choice, after the court considering her employment discrimination claims found that any privilege related to such communications had been waived.

Know Thyself (And Thy Own Discovery Obligations) -- A Case Law Update [eDiscovery Alert]

January 03, 2024

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill discussed how a recent decision involving a business dispute over the sale of a company illustrates the standard a party must meet to compel designation of an ESI custodian.

Even Judges Get Fed Up at Some Point – Case Law Update [eDiscovery Alert]

December 08, 2023

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill discussed how the judge in an employment case against the New York Fed grants in part and denies in part a motion for discovery sanctions after finding the plaintiffs’ repeated discovery failures constituted intentional bad faith and wasted court time and resources.

Should Personal Cell Phones be off the eDiscovery Radar? – Case Law Update [eDiscovery Alert]

November 29, 2023

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill discussed how in a trade secret case, a federal district court orders the imaging of employees’ work laptops, but not their personal cellphones.

Speak for Yourself! – A Case Law Update [eDiscovery Alert]

November 07, 2023

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill discussed how, in the case MC Trilogy Texas, LLC v. City of Heath, Texas, a federal court rejected the plaintiff's attempt to challenge subpoenas served on non-parties by the defendant.

When Phone-y Evidence Leads to Case Terminating Sanctions [eDiscovery Alert]

October 24, 2023

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill elaborate on a district court’s decision to terminate a case and impose attorney fees and costs as sanctions for the plaintiff’s fabrication and spoliation of evidence.

Impossibility Is Not a Ticket Out of ESI Protocol Compliance [eDiscovery Alert]

October 11, 2023

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill elaborate on a case in which Stubhub was chastised for agreeing to an ESI protocol, failing to produce documents according to the terms of the protocol, and then arguing that compliance with the protocol was impossible.

Spoliation Argument Gets Frosty Reception from Court Absent Intent [eDiscovery Alert]

September 21, 2023

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill elaborate on a Maryland court’s decision to deny a plaintiff’s motion for spoliation sanctions, finding that he did not meet his burden of demonstrating that the defendants had an “intent to deprive” him of lost data.

I Never Met-a-data I Didn’t Want to Collect [eDiscovery Alert]

September 12, 2023

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill discuss a recent case before the U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont, in which the court largely rejected the defendants’ arguments to avoid supplementation to their discovery production, and granted in part the plaintiff’s motions to compel.

Attorneys Must be in the eDiscovery Driver’s Seat [eDiscovery Alert]

August 25, 2023

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill detail a recent word of caution from a federal court considering a products liability case, specifically warning that attorneys may not rely on custodial self-collections and must instead test the accuracy of their clients’ discovery efforts.

This Director’s Emails are Out of Control [eDiscovery Alert]

August 09, 2023

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill share a federal court’s recent decision on a party’s request for access to the personal email account of the opposing party’s Director of Operations – the court found that the requesting party failed to meet its burden of establishing that the account was in the opposition’s “control.”

AI Is Not Just eDiscovery’s Future — It’s Also Its Past [eDiscovery Alert]

July 24, 2023

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill explain why lawyers can and should embrace generative AI technology for use in the eDiscovery context, utilizing a trust-but-verify approach — just as we have done for other AI technologies.

A Relevant Decision Regarding Relevancy Redactions [eDiscovery Alert]

June 28, 2023

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill share a recent contract dispute where the court held that relevancy redactions were allowable even though a protective order was in place.

Things Get Spicy When McCormick Attempts Document Dump in Contract Dispute [eDiscovery Alert]

June 13, 2023

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill offer perspective on a recent decision that found a party was required to review documents for relevance before producing them.

Order’s Up: No Spoliation Sanctions for Cook’s Failure to Back-up Stolen iPhone [eDiscovery Alert]

May 31, 2023

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill discuss a recent decision declining to find the requisite “intent to deprive” when a plaintiff was unable to produce text messages because his phone had been stolen and he had not taken measures to back up its contents, despite initiating litigation almost a year prior to the theft.

An Agent’s Emails are Within a Golfer’s Control: No Ifs, Ands, or Putts About It [eDiscovery Alert]

May 11, 2023

Joe Tate and Nicole Gill offer insight on a recent decision regarding possession, custody, or control in a case between PGA, Inc., and professional golfers.

Possession, Custody, and Control in the Era of eDiscovery [The Legal Intelligencer]

March 03, 2023

Joseph Tate and Nicole Gill published an article to The Legal Intelligencer discussing the question of whether specific ESI is in the "possession, custody or control" of a party, a topic that remains unsettled and subject to debate.

How Information Governance Impacts the E-Discovery Process

February 04, 2022

Joseph Tate and Nicole Gill published an article to The Legal Intelligencer discussing how as the e-discovery lifecycle has matured, information governance has taken on a more prominent and important role as the foundational stage of the process.

Technological Solutions for E-Discovery Professionals [Bloomberg Law]

December 08, 2021

Nicole Marie Gill and Emily Plowcha published an article to Bloomberg Law discussing technological solutions for e-discovery professionals when working remotely.

Ethical Challenges of Conducting E-Discovery in a Remote Work Environment

February 05, 2021

Joseph Tate and Emily Plowcha contributed an article to The Legal Intelligencer discussing how the remote work environment has significantly impacted e-discovery and the ethical obligations of attorneys in the ever-evolving technological and legal landscape.

Emerging Data Types and IoT of E-Discovery in Civil Litigation [The Legal Intelligencer]

March 24, 2020

Joseph Tate and David Walton published an article to The Legal Intelligencer discussing that your new IoT data may be subject to preservation, collection and production in civil litigation.

Geospatial Data: A Missed Opportunity for Electronic Discovery Matters [Legaltech news]

March 18, 2020

Stephen Johnson, assistant director in the Electronic Discovery and Practice Advisory Services Group at Cozen O'Connor, published an article to Legaltech news discussing how to maximize the use of geospatial data.

In The News

CODISCOVR Adds Veteran eDiscovery Counsel Caitlin Oyler, Opens West Coast Office

April 09, 2024

Caitlin Oyler joins the team and will practice out of the firm’s Los Angeles office. Oyler is the first CODISCOVR member on the West Coast.

Cozen O’Connor Promotes 23 Attorneys to Member

March 15, 2024

“This is a group of terrific lawyers across many offices and practices areas and we look forward to following their achievements,” said Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Michael J. Heller.

CODISCOVR Promotes Nicole Marie Gill to Chair and Managing Member

February 26, 2024

CODISCOVR, an ancillary business of Cozen O’Connor that handles all aspects of eDiscovery and information governance, promoted Nicole Marie Gill to managing member and chair. Gill is the first woman to lead this group. She previously served as vice-chair of CODISCOVR and has extensive experience managing complex and high-profile eDiscovery projects.

Nicole Gill Selected to Participate on Sedona Conference Working Group

July 18, 2023

Previously part of a brainstorming group, Gill will now be part of the drafting team to develop commentary on the topic of Exporting Data from the People’s Republic of China.

Diverging ‘Possession, Custody or Control’ Tests Impact E-Discovery Outcomes. But Is a Uniform Standard Feasible? [Legaltech News]

May 05, 2023

Nicole Gill recently contributed to an article for Legaltech News on how diverging possession, custody, or control tests impact eDiscovery outcomes.

Sedona Conference’s 2022 eDiscovery Negotiation Training

April 05, 2022

Joe Tate, as a faculty member, and Nicole Marie Gill, as a participant, attended the Sedona Conference’s 2022 eDiscovery Negotiation Training.

Cozen O'Connor Brings On New E-Discovery Chair For Philly Office

February 18, 2021

Joseph Tate, Calli Padilla, and Maureen Holland are featured in a Law360 article highlighting recent leadership changes and the firm's summer associate program.

Fifty-Eight Cozen O'Connor Attorneys Named Pennsylvania Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

June 05, 2020

Super Lawyers has selected 58 Cozen O'Connor attorneys to the 2020 Pennsylvania Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists.

People

Awards

Fifty-Eight Cozen O'Connor Attorneys Named Pennsylvania Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

June 05, 2020

Super Lawyers has selected 58 Cozen O'Connor attorneys to the 2020 Pennsylvania Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists.

64 Cozen O'Connor Attorneys Named Pennsylvania Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

May 21, 2019

Super Lawyers has selected 64 Cozen O'Connor attorneys to the 2019 Pennsylvania Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists.

Related Practice Areas

Keep up-to-date with the latest news from Cozen O'Connor

Enter your City or Zip.

Probably shouldn't change this:
Sign up to receive alerts, publications, and event / webinar invites.

By submitting your contact information, you are giving Cozen O'Connor consent to contact you via email.